The difference between Zero Trust and VPNs? Better protection for your business
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), also known as the software-defined perimeter (SDP), is a set of technologies and functionalities that enable secure access to internal applications for remote users.
It operates on an adaptive trust model, where trust is never implicit, and access is granted on a need-to-know, least-privileged basis defined by granular policies. ZTNA gives remote users seamless, secure connectivity to private applications without ever placing them on the network or exposing apps to the internet.
Zero Trust security is a big buzzword these days. Whilst many organisations have shifted their priorities to adopt Zero Trust, ZTNA is the strategy behind achieving an effective Zero Trust model.
The path to Zero Trust as an ideology is vague, so ZTNA provides a clear, defined framework for organisations to follow. It’s also a component of the secure access service edge (SASE) security model, which, in addition to ZTNA comprises next-generation firewall (NGFW), SD-WAN, and other services in a cloud-native platform.
How does ZTNA work?
Whilst the need to secure a remote workforce has become critical, network-centric solutions such as virtual private networks (VPNs) and firewalls create an attack surface that can be exploited. ZTNA takes a fundamentally different approach to providing secure remote access to internal applications based on these four core principles:
- ZTNA completely isolates the act of providing application access from network access. This isolation reduces risks to the network, such as infection by compromised devices, and only grants access to specific applications for authorised users who have been authenticated.
- ZTNA makes outbound-only connections, ensuring both network and application infrastructure are made invisible to unauthorised users. IPs are never exposed to the internet, creating a ‘darknet’ that makes the network impossible to find.
- ZTNA’s native app segmentation ensures that once users are authorised, application access is granted on a one-to-one basis. Authorised users have access to only specific applications rather than full access to the network. Segmentation prevents overly permissive access, as well as the risk of lateral movement of malware and other threats.
- ZTNA takes a user-to-application approach rather than a traditional network security approach. The network becomes de-emphasised, and the internet becomes the new corporate network, leveraging end-to-end encrypted TLS micro-tunnels instead of MPLS.
What’s the difference between VPN and ZTNA?
Amongst the most popular legacy security solutions in use today, VPNs are meant to simplify access management by allowing end-users to securely access a network, and therefore corporate resources, through a designated tunnel, usually through single sign-on (SSO).
For many years, VPNs worked well for employees who needed to work remotely for a day or two, but as the world saw more and more long-term remote workers, these VPNs become ineffective due to their lack of scalability and the extreme amount of maintenance (and cost) to keep them running.
What’s more, the rapid adoption of the public cloud meant that is not only become more difficult to apply security policies to this new breadth of remote workers, but also hurt the user experience.
The main problem with VPNs, however, is the attack surface they create. Any user or entity with the necessary SSO credentials can log on to a VPN and move laterally throughout the network, giving them access to all the resources and data the VPN was meant to protect.
ZTNA secures user access by granting it on the principle of least privilege. Rather than trusting based on correct credentials, Zero Trust authenticates only under the correct context – that is, when the user, identity, device and location all match up.
Furthermore, ZTNA provides granular access rather than network access. Users are connected directly and securely to the applications and data they need, which prevents the possibility of lateral movement by malicious users. Plus, because user connections are direct, experiences are vastly improved when leveraging a ZTNA framework.
Top ZTNA use cases
ZTNA has many cloud security use cases. Most organisations choose to start with one of these four:
- VPN alternative – VPNs are inconvenient and slow for users, offer poor security and are difficult to manage, so organisations want to reduce or eliminate their reliance on them. Gartner predicts that by the end of 2023, 60% of enterprises will phase out most of their remote access VPNs in favour of ZTNA.
- Secure multi-cloud access – Securing hybrid and multi-cloud access is the most popular place for organisations to start their ZTNA journey. With more companies adopting cloud applications and services, 37% of them are turning to ZTNA for security and access control for their multi-cloud strategies.
- Reduce third-party risk – Most third-party users receive overprivileged access, and they largely access applications using unmanaged devices, both of which introduce risks. ZTNA significantly reduces third-party risk by ensuring external users never gain access to the network and that only authorised users can access allowed applications.
- Accelerate M&A integration – With typical M&As, integration can span multiple years as organisations converge networks and deal with overlapping IPs. ZTNA reduces and simplifies the time and management needed to ensure a successful M&A, providing immediate value to the business.
Considerations for ZTNA
In Gartner’s recent Market Guide on Zero Trust Network Access, Steve Riley, Neil MacDonald and Lawrence Orans outline several things organisations should consider when choosing a ZTNA solution:
- Does the vendor require an endpoint agent to be installed? What operating systems are supported? What mobile devices? How well does the agent behave in the presence of other agents? Note: ZTNA technologies that do not support clientless use often can’t support unmanaged device use cases (e.g. third-party access, BYOD).
- Does the offering support only web applications or can legacy (data centre) applications gain the same security advantages?
- Some ZTNA products are delivered partly or wholly as cloud-based services. Does this meet the organisations security and residency requirements? Note: Gartner recommends that enterprises favour vendors that offer ZTNA as a service, as services are easier to deploy, more available, and provide better security against DDoS attacks.
- To what extent is partial or full cloaking, or allowing or prohibiting inbound connections, a part of the isolated application’s security requirements?
- What authentication standards does the trust broker support? Is integration with an on-premises directory or cloud-based identity services available? Does the trust broker integrate with the organisation’s existing identity provider?
- How geographically diverse are the vendor’s entry and exit points? (Referred to as edge locations and/or points of presence).
- After the user and the user device pass authentication, does the trust broker remain resident in the data path?
- Does the offering integrate with unified endpoint management (UEM) providers, or can the local agent determine device health and security posture as factors in the access decision? What UEM vendors has the ZTNA vendor partnered with?
These are all important considerations for your enterprise as you look for the ZTNA vendor that complements your present and forward-looking goals and vision.
To learn more about ZTNA, check out our leading ZTNA service, Zscaler Private Access. We would be happy to demo the solution for you.